Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 150
In response to
"
It's not always that black and white with one person totally at fault for an accident. -- nm
"
by
Cuzzin Todd
No, but in a rear ender it is. -- nm
Posted by
Subversive
Jul 6 '09, 07:47
(No message)
Responses:
not always - sorry but true.
-
Epiphany
Jul 6, 07:49
7
Can we agree that in tfox's case it is clearly not his fault?
-
Subversive
Jul 6, 07:50
6
Hells yeah we can agree to that. Something else as an aside
-
Epiphany
Jul 6, 07:55
2
Nah, I'm golden (other than the bit of flu I caught at camp, but I don't think collisions can cause the flu.) -- nm
-
TFox
Jul 6, 07:56
1
Better sue, just in case. -- nm
-
Subversive
Jul 6, 07:56
The best part: it was outside a church having a cookout, and there were *four* cops directing traffic.
-
TFox
Jul 6, 07:53
2
Ya know...in thinking about it. realistically...you could force both the company AND the driver to file claims (example inside)
-
Jim
Jul 6, 07:56
Oh, excellent. That makes it a slam dunk. -- nm
-
Subversive
Jul 6, 07:55
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
