Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 09:42
2: Nov 27, 18:07
3: Nov 27, 12:04
4: Nov 27, 08:26
5: Nov 26, 18:06
6: Nov 26, 12:05
7: Nov 26, 08:29
8: Nov 25, 18:33
9: Nov 25, 11:12
10: Nov 25, 07:08
11: Nov 24, 13:17
12: Nov 23, 18:13
13: Nov 23, 06:17
14: Nov 22, 13:24
15: Nov 22, 09:09
16: Nov 21, 22:36
17: Nov 21, 14:03
18: Nov 21, 10:18
19: Nov 21, 07:35
20: Nov 20, 15:19
Posts: 154
In response to
"
The Rittenhouse Trial Could Never Have Been What Americans Wanted -- (link)
"
by
oblique
I respectfully disagree. Not guilty = he did nothing wrong vs guilty = he did something wrong. -- nm*
Posted by
Spawn
Nov 19 '21, 11:38
(No message)
Responses:
I found this interesting as well: How a Vaguely Worded Wisconsin Law Could Let Rittenhouse Walk -- (link)
-
oblique
Nov 19, 11:43
3
Here's also a key part of that instruction.
-
pmb
Nov 19, 12:30
2
The weapon he was carrying didn't match the description of an unlawful weapon based on WI law. The statute specified if the barrel was less than a
-
jnine
Nov 19, 17:39
What little I read was there was some issue regarding the length of the weapon when it comes to Wisconsin law? -- nm
-
oblique
Nov 19, 12:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.