Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 153
In response to
"
Though I was just wondering recently if that Constitutional requirement was outdated. -- nm
"
by
Dano
Outdated? In the Constitution? -- nm
Posted by
Roger More (aka RogerMore)
Dec 15 '21, 08:14
(No message)
Responses:
(More seriously, I'm not sure that it is outdated. America has always been a nation of immigrants. It would have been a s much a consideration at the
-
Roger More
Dec 15, 08:18
5
It was such a consideration that they....didn't even define the term 'natural born' -- nm
-
ty97
Dec 15, 08:20
4
Though they still included it as one of only three eligibility requirements, and in drafting it was changed from 'citizen' to 'natural born citizen'.
-
Roger More
Dec 15, 08:27
1
Same debate, yes, but we're not a new nation anymore so I'm just saying it' fair to revisit the debate
-
ty97
Dec 15, 08:28
Seriously though, I think it was meant to stop someone with non-US alliances from coming here and becoming POTUS. -- (edited)
-
ty97
Dec 15, 08:22
1
Or pooty-poot. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Dec 15, 08:26
States rights are outdated! -- nm
-
Qale
Dec 15, 08:15
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
