Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 156
In response to
"
I think that's has already shown, and will show more to be alarmist.
"
by
Inigo
*shrug* let's hope so, but just assuming he's wrong seems dangerous. -- nm
Posted by
Candie Cane (aka Andie)
Dec 21 '21, 08:32
(No message)
Responses:
.66% (probably more like .5%) of South Africa being infected by Omicron is not assuming. It's what the data is.
-
Inigo
Dec 21, 08:36
8
WHO literally said 3 days ago that it is too soon to say it is less severe. Yes, there are indicators but that is not yet proven. -- (edited)
-
Candie Cane
Dec 21, 08:41
7
I don't have much really to add to the discussion. But I did want to mention that 3 days in OmicronLand is a long ass time in comparison. -- nm
-
Qale
Dec 21, 09:05
It's worth remembering too that Delta was both more transmissible and also more likely to put people in hospital, in the ICU, or in the mortuary than
-
Roger More
Dec 21, 08:51
1
Yeah, there's rules of thumb on this but they aren't carved in stone like some sort of equation. Biology is messy. -- nm
-
Reagen
Dec 21, 08:57
Sure, let's be cautious since this is early in the variant's life. But we should also be cautious about how many people will get infected, too.
-
Inigo
Dec 21, 08:46
3
the 24 hour news cycle is so dangerous here. we are so used to "information now" that "chill while science works" isn't acceptable. there are no
-
amanda jeans
Dec 21, 09:04
1
this is such a good point. things get reported, then we know more, and everyone is stuck on what was first said. (See the doc who first said vaccines
-
Candie Cane
Dec 21, 09:36
Also, thank you for having a calm discussion about this, Andie, MDH, mandy and all. :) -- nm
-
Inigo
Dec 21, 08:55
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.