ST Alpha - "If the court system won't do in-person trials, why should the school system do in-person teaching? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 174

If the court system won't do in-person trials, why should the school system do in-person teaching? -- nm

Posted by Beryllium (aka grayman) Jan 3 '22, 12:37

(No message)

Responses:

They should be doing in-person trials and the vast majority of kids learn better in-person. -- nm - spamlet Jan 3, 12:44 5
- Not with the current wave in BC, no thanks. If fully vaccinated people aren't willing to go in-person, why should partially or unvaccinated children? -- nm - Beryllium Jan 3, 12:56 4
  - Because they’re much less at risk of developing severe cases and the benefits of in-person learning far outweigh the risk. -- nm - spamlet Jan 3, 13:08 3
    - I suppose there's some truth to that, but since even mild cases can trigger lifelong health effects, it would be wiser long-term thinking to avoid it. -- nm - Beryllium Jan 3, 13:16 2
      - The argument I've heard people make here is: You're guaranteeing your kids don't learn/develop versus a extremely minute chance of any impact. - MDH Jan 3, 13:26 1
        
        One of them is already getting fucked around by the system, we've been considering pulling him next year. -- nm - Beryllium Jan 3, 14:03

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.