ST Alpha - "Because they’re much less at risk of developing severe cases and the benefits of in-person learning far outweigh the risk. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 174

In response to "Not with the current wave in BC, no thanks. If fully vaccinated people aren't willing to go in-person, why should partially or unvaccinated children? -- nm" by Beryllium

Because they’re much less at risk of developing severe cases and the benefits of in-person learning far outweigh the risk. -- nm

Posted by spamlet Jan 3 '22, 13:08

(No message)

Responses:

I suppose there's some truth to that, but since even mild cases can trigger lifelong health effects, it would be wiser long-term thinking to avoid it. -- nm - Beryllium Jan 3, 13:16 2
- The argument I've heard people make here is: You're guaranteeing your kids don't learn/develop versus a extremely minute chance of any impact. - MDH Jan 3, 13:26 1
  - One of them is already getting fucked around by the system, we've been considering pulling him next year. -- nm - Beryllium Jan 3, 14:03

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.