In response to
"Crash's IM is correct. -- nm"
by
The Allfather
|
That’s genuinely dumb. It’s dumb enough if that’s the way it is, I think I’m out. Needlessly complex. Even in the pros, you trade from your annual
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Jan 3 '22, 14:16
|
List of picks. The only promise to hit a range is I take the risk of you being really good and getting the 32nd pick in a round or being shot and getting the first pick in a round.
We know where everyone’s picking. Give me the pick based on this year’s results. If you wanna keep, or not keep, fine… but give me a finite pick.
That’s insanely complicated and limits all trading. Why the hell would I give up Kelce for what could be a 9th round pick? If you promise me top 50, you now limit yourself to a trade that caps you with keepers since you now can’t exceed the trade limit of keepers as well.
Why the fuck can’t it be simple.
I earn the 2nd pick in every round. Why would I trade for a variable pick depending on your actions now that we know the draft order?
|
Responses:
|