ST Alpha - "No, I'm trying to trade an asset for another asset knowing that each side knows *EXACTLY* what they're getting / giving up" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "So then you make player for player trades. The new rules force creativity all the way around, starting with last year's draft." by The Allfather

No, I'm trying to trade an asset for another asset knowing that each side knows EXACTLY what they're getting / giving up

Posted by Will Hunting (aka kelly) Jan 3 '22, 18:25

Crash wants to give me 3-8 for Kelce, knowing he's keeping 5 players in addition to Kelce, fine.

I get 3-8.
He gets Kelce and 15-2.
He uses 7-8 to re-draft Kelce.

So in the end, it's 3-8 for Kelce and 15-2.

Responses:

Which would be great if CRASH HAD 3-8. - The Allfather Jan 3, 18:27 8
- Why do you keep thinking this trade is happening after the Keepers happen? They get locked like 24 hours before the draft. I'm making this deal 8 -- (edited) - Will Hunting Jan 3, 18:32 7
  - because he decided that "first x picks" for keepers actually means "picks in the first x rounds" - znufrii Jan 3, 18:41 3
    - Sincere question: how else could it work? - The Allfather Jan 3, 18:47 2
      - They each had 15 draft picks. At the time of the draft, one of them chose to spend their top 2 picks on 2 keepers. The other chose to spend their top 8 picks on 8 keepers. -- (edited) - Will Hunting Jan 3, 18:57
      - *original reply deleted* - znufrii Jan 3, 18:51
  - Yes, 3-8 does happen too. I pick my 4th player since I either picked with 1-2, 2-2, 3-2 (either fresh player or a keeper) - Will Hunting Jan 3, 18:34 2
    - You shouldn't, just like Crash shouldn't only keep one other player to get Kelce. So, you'll have to be more creative with trades. -- nm - The Allfather Jan 3, 18:40 1
      - Actually I don't need to. There's no reason to trade. There's no reason to be creative. - Will Hunting Jan 3, 18:47

Post a message top

No, I'm trying to trade an asset for another asset knowing that each side knows *EXACTLY* what they're getting / giving up

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.

No, I'm trying to trade an asset for another asset knowing that each side knows EXACTLY what they're getting / giving up