Backboards: 
Posts: 157
In response to "You shouldn't, just like Crash shouldn't only keep one other player to get Kelce. So, you'll have to be more creative with trades. -- nm" by The Allfather

Actually I don't need to. There's no reason to trade. There's no reason to be creative.

Assets are valued on some variable manner months later on the whims of keepers that you can't wrap your head around as occurring after the trades are done.

in the NFL, you trade for a Team and Round, potentially years in advance. That asset has value becuase it's range of players is 32 picks....but it doesn't shift entire rounds based on who the team has on it's roster.

Crash can value Kelce as a 3rd rounder knowing he'll have to lose a 7th as well. That's his choice. It's known up front what people are getting. No one needs to guess what keepers are happening, or anything of the sort. They have their 15 picks, they spend them how they want with the only caveat being any keepers are kept in descending order from the draft picks on hand. Keep 2, you've spent your 1st and 2nd picks (not rounds). Keep 7, you've spent your first 7 picks. The traded one is no longer yours, but the draft pick you got back is so spend away.


Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.