Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Seems like a big overreaction. So, par for the Wall Street course. -- nm
"
by
Inigo
I think it is an overreaction but until MS states the obvious (they ain’t burning billions of annual revenue by not developing for PS)
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Jan 19 '22, 07:39
There’s a concern that Sony does get hit by this.
Responses:
I know we discussed this yesterday, but I really think that's MS plan. They are hoping gamers will follow the IP and not be console loyal
-
decline
Jan 19, 08:01
1
I think it’s likely there’s a 3-6 month exclusive period but there is no logical reason to cut off PS.
-
Will Hunting
Jan 19, 08:10
I mean, maybe. But games\PS5 are only 25% of the their revenue.
-
Inigo
Jan 19, 07:46
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.