Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 154
In response to
"
WWE: 2021 reports revenue over $1 Billion. -- nm
"
by
Remlik
"For the love of God, someone please buy us." -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Feb 3 '22, 13:53
(No message)
Responses:
MITB viewership up 20%, Summerslam up 30% Suadi event up 75% in viewership on Peacock vs the Network
-
Remlik
Feb 3, 14:16
14
"Okay, we're desperate for positives. What's the best thing we can say about the company other than money?" "Uhh...something Peacock, maybe?" -- nm
-
David
Feb 3, 14:24
13
Peacock has 3.5 Mill paid subs
-
Remlik
Feb 3, 15:54
2
No, Peacock has 9 million subscribers. Only 1/3 of them have ever watched a WWE program. It's a disastrous statement he's making as a brag. -- nm
-
David
Feb 3, 16:04
made a deal for Disney streaming
-
Remlik
Feb 3, 16:00
I read an article recently that I think had the first coherent explanation for WWE's strategy (other than just being sold). Apparently HHH said in
-
pmb
Feb 3, 15:07
9
It's the philosophy that explains how they unintentionally turned a monopoly into a duopoly. -- nm
-
David
Feb 3, 16:05
2
For sure. But that doesn't mean that at this point it isn't financially effective (I'm not really sure). I don't think it's a long term strategy
-
pmb
Feb 3, 16:35
1
They're banking making their money and selling before they lose their current contracts.
-
David
Feb 3, 16:37
they've been in that mode that the E is the star and not the wrestlers since late 2000's. -- nm
-
Remlik
Feb 3, 15:20
5
It was far less noticeable then as they had Cena and they also had the Rock making appearances and Lesnar as a long time champion. I don't think they
-
pmb
Feb 3, 15:29
4
They picked Cena specifically because he did what he was told. It's the same with Seth Rollins.
-
David
Feb 3, 16:07
2
But they're clearly committed in a different way to it now. Look at NXT. It's moving to all homegrown talent. They don't want to bring in popular
-
pmb
Feb 3, 16:32
1
I don't think you can put any rhyme or reason into anything WWE's doing right now. They just blow it all up every few months. -- nm
-
David
Feb 3, 16:47
In Cena, they found their sucker. They’ve wanted to be this since Rock / Austin and Mick all left in the early 2000’s.
-
Will Hunting
Feb 3, 15:52
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.