Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 153
In response to
"
yes, but that would not be a nationalization of a bank. -- nm
"
by
tRuMaN
Given the looseness with which falling-skyers are using the term, it would be.
Posted by
TWuG
Jul 8 '09, 07:58
But it isn't. It wasn't 20 years ago, or 10, or 5.
All of a sudden government investment (which businesses USED to love until it came with operational strings attached) is a bad thing.
Responses:
all I know is that I am more than willing to start a business if the government wants to give me free money.
-
tRuMaN
Jul 8, 08:00
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.