Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 161
In response to
"
Why? Kerry was about as bad a candidate as the Dems could put up in 2004.
"
by
Inigo
Huh? How was he a bad candidate? -- nm
Posted by
the liioulu with fabric flowers and real cake (aka liioulu)
Jul 8 '09, 17:03
(No message)
Responses:
He lost to Bush. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jul 8, 17:05
5
That's not a bad candidate, just a losing one.
-
the liioulu with fabric flowers and real cake
Jul 8, 17:10
4
You're thinking of Gore. The Bush/Kerry election wasn't really that close.
-
Inigo
Jul 8, 17:12
3
It was. " Bush won the popular vote with 50.73% to Kerry's 48.27%. Although in percentage terms it was the closest popular margin ever for a victoriou
-
the liioulu with fabric flowers and real cake
Jul 8, 17:21
I consider the flipping of Ohio changing the results as close. -- nm
-
David
Jul 8, 17:19
Yes, Bush/Kerry was a fair win by Bush, I think.
-
Beryllium
Jul 8, 17:18
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
