Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 155
In response to
"
I think it fundamentally comes down to at what point you consider a fetus a person.
"
by
Dano
Except even that last part isn't canon for them. And the problem with the first part is that it's essentially a religious argument. It's like making
Posted by
pmb (aka pmb)
May 6 '22, 15:35
laws based on whether heaven and hell exist and what they are.
Responses:
Just saying that you can’t argue with someone who begins with assumption that that is a fact. -- nm
-
Dano
May 6, 15:44
3
you noiw what's interesting, using that point ofz view I just tslked about completely confused them. -- nm
-
loosilu
May 6, 16:16
1
The concept that a man cannot simply procreate as he pleases is entirely foreign to them. -- nm*
-
znufrii
May 6, 16:19
Right. I agree that is essentially their "answer" to the argument posed. It isn't about how the woman got pregnant, it's that there is a "life"
-
pmb
May 6, 15:48
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.