ST Alpha - "I'd say so. I'd also throw rotoscope into the genre of "animation."" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "Genuine question about Avatar. At what point is a movie considered "Animated"? Does it have to be 100%? Is Roger Rabbit an animated movie? -- (edited)" by Volnelk

I'd say so. I'd also throw rotoscope into the genre of "animation."

Posted by RelutantCynic (aka ReluctantCynic) May 9 '22, 11:17

I think animation is in the eye of the beholder for the most part, but to me, an animated film has to be more animated than not.

Responses:

So the Disney inappropriately (well IMO) termed 'live action' remakes qualify? Lion King, Jungle Book? -- nm - JD May 9, 11:25 3
- I agree with Mop and Roger More. - RelutantCynic May 9, 11:55 1
  - So do I but I would argue that the Lion King remake has the vast majority of screen time given to 'animated' elements so that it is an animated film -- nm - JD May 9, 12:13
- I've always wondered about this, and as per Roger More's comment, these are all considered "live action". -- nm* - Mop May 9, 11:42

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.