Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Judge rules Elon Musk made reckless and inaccurate statements about taking Tesla private -- (link)
"
by
znufrii
TSLA: −56.83 (7.10%) -- nm
Posted by
Mop (aka rburriel)
May 11 '22, 12:00
(No message)
Responses:
How much further does it need to go to f*ck up the financing of his TWTR deal? -- nm
-
znufrii
May 11, 12:04
6
This ruling is likely to tank the price of Tesla stock further as the implication is that it was artificially inflated.
-
Mop
May 11, 12:11
4
Not really. it’s a shareholder lawsuit intending to recoup losses incurred by anyone who traded at the time of his fraudulent statements -- (edited)
-
znufrii
May 11, 12:14
3
Yeah, the current Tesla insane valuation is totally different than this fraud.
-
Will Hunting
May 11, 12:43
2
Right.
-
znufrii
May 11, 12:52
1
Which is of course insane since it jumped 10+% immediately. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
May 11, 12:57
I believe it's getting very close -- nm
-
decline
May 11, 12:05
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
