Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 153
In response to
"
The Chicago Bears signed walking disaster Nathan Peterman as a backup QB, so here's my semi-quarterly rant that a somewhat
"
by
Diva
Back up to the back up but I agree somewhat. I doubt Kap would sign to be a 3rd string arm for training camp but
Posted by
zunk xometimes (aka zunkskunk)
May 12 '22, 07:54
clearly no one's even sniffing at him for a back-up role.
Responses:
My opinion, it's pretty obvious at this point that he was only interested in starting jobs. -- nm
-
Strongbad
May 12, 08:01
2
so what? And this isn't on him. He was blackballed. Any other assertion supports the racism. -- nm
-
Diva
May 12, 09:39
But never finishing them! -- nm
-
nagging wife
May 12, 08:02
parsing not necessary. -- nm
-
Diva
May 12, 07:56
1
*Looks up parsing* Sorry. Didn't mean to do that. Just my opinion Peterman may not be on the roster week 1. Trevor Siemian is #2. The Bears should
-
zunk xometimes
May 12, 08:18
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.