Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 153
Before commercial crew launches, NASA was spending $1 biillion per astronaut to orbit. SpaceX is charging $55 million per astronaut. -- (link)
Posted by
TWuG
May 23 '22, 16:50
(No message)
https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/05/how-nasa-finally-melted-its-giant-self-licking-ice-cream-cone/
(arstechnica.com)
Responses:
Without clicking any of these links, I thought it was about $500M for each shuttle launch. Unless they were sending only half an astronaut each time..
-
zork
May 23, 17:23
that's an incredibly misleading comparison. -- (edited)
-
znufrii
May 23, 16:54
5
It's about 1/10 the cost per kilo to orbit as it was a decade ago.
-
TWuG
May 23, 17:03
4
It's going to drop again with starship, right? Or is that a starship-inclusive number? -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 23, 17:34
1
I believe the 1/10th is just with Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, since they actually fly. -- nm
-
TWuG
May 23, 19:26
that's what leveraging decades of government research gets you. -- nm
-
mafic
May 23, 17:33
1
You'd think, then, that ULA with its decades of experience in the field would be the lowest cost provider.
-
TWuG
May 23, 19:29
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.