Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 151
In response to
"
Don’t you need lateral momentum to actually reach orbit though? -- (edited)
"
by
znufrii
I believe the ultimate intent is to "throw it" up high enough where a small rocket kicks in to get it into orbit if I remember right from earlier
Posted by
oblique (aka kkuphal)
May 24 '22, 10:28
articles
Responses:
Yeah, saving on the fuel costs of the first 10-50km of launch altitude is a huge deal. And using electricity instead of rocket fuel is good. -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 24, 11:01
4
It also makes a mean daiquiri. -- nm
-
Reagen
May 24, 11:29
3
I feel like a double O agent needs to be launched out of it. 10,000 Gs is survivable, right? -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 24, 11:32
2
That depends. Are you a tardigrade? -- nm
-
Reagen
May 24, 11:37
Briefly, yes. -- nm
-
Swilcan Baron
May 24, 11:34
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.