ST Alpha - "that's not how invitations work -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "I agree with this, but if the invite didn't *say* "no +1", I can understand assuming that +1 is okay. -- nm" by Dr.Vermin

that's not how invitations work -- nm

Posted by dug (aka chris) Jul 10 '09, 12:05

(No message)

Responses:

[shrug] I'm certainly not an expert. I defer to your experience. -- nm - Dr.Vermin Jul 10, 12:07 9
- consider that these people have to be fed and seated. If you booked a 150 person hall and 200 show up, you've got chaos on your hands. -- nm - Reagen Jul 10, 12:08 7
  - I said I defer! - Dr.Vermin Jul 10, 12:12 5
    - unwritten? unknown? Not even close. -- nm - loosilu Jul 10, 12:15 2
      - All these extra-guest-bringers this woman has on her RSVP list show that you're wrong. -- nm - Dr.Vermin Jul 10, 12:17 1
        
        No, the stacks of etiquette books say the rules are written and widely disseminated. The people inviting their own guests - loosilu Jul 10, 12:20
    - Leave it to the conservative to invoke Amendment 10 to the wedding invite rulebook. - Will Hunting Jul 10, 12:13
    - "You didn't say no horses." -- nm - Reagen Jul 10, 12:13
  - and as we discussed the other day, it's not cheap food. -- nm - loosilu Jul 10, 12:10
- the invitation is for the person named on it. no one else. -- nm - loosilu Jul 10, 12:07

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.