ST Alpha - "they should have allowed for +1. now they have to say no and accept it if people are put-out. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "fine, you think you're so hax smart. bonus chat q: they did not invite their wedding guests to bring a "+1" people are RSVPing with +1s (and more)" by dug

they should have allowed for +1. now they have to say no and accept it if people are put-out.

Posted by b. (aka starrynit) Jul 10 '09, 12:09

i've never heard of not allowing for 1 guest. you know a good lot will likely come alone, so there's coverage.

also, bah to her for thinking everyone will bring people they only just met at bars the night before. so judgy/dismissive of people she wants at her wedding.

Responses:

"allowed" meaning invited with "and guest" - b. Jul 10, 12:10 8
- disagree, they have every right not to do that. -- nm - loosilu Jul 10, 12:11 7
  - sure, they have a right to do whatever they want; but that doesn't make it, er, right. - b. Jul 10, 12:15 5
    - I can't disagree more strongly. It's a party, a very expensive one. They invite who they want. It's not up to the guests - loosilu Jul 10, 12:17 3
      - i think more care should be given by both sides. - b. Jul 10, 12:22 2
        
        I think both parties should have picked up the phone before licking a postage stamp. -- nm - loosilu Jul 10, 12:23 1
        
        i'm good with that. (and who licks anymore? ew.) -- nm - b. Jul 10, 12:25
    - Why do people add +1.....cuz that's how you're alerted to bring guests. Not the inverse. -- nm - Will Hunting Jul 10, 12:16
  - and you could call your friend and ASK if she's dating someone. -- nm - loosilu Jul 10, 12:12

Post a message top

they should have allowed for +1. now they have to say no and accept it if people are put-out.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.