Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 152
In response to
"
have they? CFLs are a terrible substitute, given their manufacturing cost and toxic nature..
"
by
colinski
yes. -- (link)
Posted by
znufrii
Jul 10 '09, 13:25
(No message)
Next-gen incandescents that are 30% more efficient, with three times the life span.
(www.nytimes.com)
Responses:
and they cost $5... so what? it's not an innovation until it can replace the old at the same cost..
-
colinski
Jul 10, 13:30
3
calculate a return on investment from the reduced electrical usage, then get back to me. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jul 10, 13:31
1
(and reduced replacement cost due to longer lifespan) -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 10, 13:33
Life-span costs. You have zero forward vision. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jul 10, 13:30
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.