Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 09:42
2: Nov 27, 18:07
3: Nov 27, 12:04
4: Nov 27, 08:26
5: Nov 26, 18:06
6: Nov 26, 12:05
7: Nov 26, 08:29
8: Nov 25, 18:33
9: Nov 25, 11:12
10: Nov 25, 07:08
11: Nov 24, 13:17
12: Nov 23, 18:13
13: Nov 23, 06:17
14: Nov 22, 13:24
15: Nov 22, 09:09
16: Nov 21, 22:36
17: Nov 21, 14:03
18: Nov 21, 10:18
19: Nov 21, 07:35
20: Nov 20, 15:19
Posts: 156
In response to
"
“…yet” -- nm
"
by
znufrii
I mean, it's self-defeating, since in the next breath he says "the court should not have weighed in into a decision with profound moral implications"
Posted by
JackD (aka dawson)
Jun 24 '22, 07:23
blah blah
As Justice Scalia said when he said that Lawrence WOULD lead to Obergefell: "Do not believe it"
it's the same, but in reverse
Obergefell is next
Responses:
Zero reason there shouldn't be a court packing plan, if it could be pulled off
-
Reagen
Jun 24, 07:26
1
This is McConnell's proudest accomplishment. He just doesn't care. If no one can stop him, he'll do anything. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jun 24, 07:26
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.