Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 150
This article is saying that 3 top 65 prospects, a lottery ticket and a recent top tier pitching prospect isn’t a good haul? Wtf?
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Aug 2 '22, 12:10
That’s a *great* amount of talent to trade for Soto…I guess it might be light for Bell and Soto but 4 legitimate top tier prospects is not a bad haul.
Anyone writing that should be smacked.
Responses:
These are real prospects, too. Gore's been the best pitching prospect, Abrams looks like a potential star, and Hassell has mashed thus far.
-
David
Aug 2, 12:36
2
I can’t say anyone loses…the padres get 2+ years of Soto. It’s not a rental. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Aug 2, 13:28
1
As I joked to Krusty, when they're not in the playoffs next year, they'll sell him. -- nm
-
David
Aug 2, 13:34
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.