Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 156
In response to
"
Nearly $1 billion against Alex Jones is wonderful. Now put teeth into enforcement of the judgement and claw back every cent he tried to hide.
"
by
TWuG
someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but even if he manages to hide current assets away, he's basically fucked for anything he earns in the future
Posted by
Reagen
Oct 12 '22, 13:11
a la OJ
Responses:
the higher the total damages goes, also the greater incentive for a very creative and dogged creditors' attorney to push the envelope of collection
-
hollywood big shot
Oct 12, 13:58
Yes, though at least one case revolves/revolved around hidden assets.
-
TWuG
Oct 12, 13:16
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.