Backboards: 
Posts: 155

ML, there are pretty dramatic differences between Abrams and Lake. Lake is making baseless claims of fraud in voting not supported by any evidence

(and actually even refuted by multiple audits including the bullshit audit conducted by their own handpicked election deniers). Abrams' complaints are based on systemic policies built in to make voting more difficult. In the first election, in respect of changes to available voting locations and early voting made by the then Secretary of State who was her opponent in the race and subsequently based on baseless changes in the laws that are aimed at quelling voter turnout. Her objections are valid and she set out to legally counteract them. She still believes the system is unjust (and she's right). That is wholly different than made up claims to undermine the integrity of elections.

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.