ST Alpha - "No. It's more that tracking said $75 million and they didn't want to admit it was $60 million. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 167

In response to "Is the $67m specifically important? -- nm" by spamlet

No. It's more that tracking said $75 million and they didn't want to admit it was $60 million.

Posted by David (aka David) Oct 24 '22, 14:12

The actual on Friday was $19 million on a film with poor WOM. It probably earned slightly under $60 million, but WB simply cannot admit that right now.

Responses:

and they also get Bruce Nash to write things like "Black Adam beats expectations!", which he should know better than. -- nm - Reagen Oct 24, 14:36 1
- Huh, didn’t realize he was still doing the numbers. -- nm - spamlet Oct 24, 15:02
Oh, gotcha. I was wondering if something else opened at 67 they had to beat. -- nm - spamlet Oct 24, 14:15

Post a message top

No. It's more that tracking said $75 million and they didn't want to admit it was $60 million.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.