Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Well, that's one perspective. -- (link)
"
by
Beryllium
this is a pretty comprehensive look at why exactly Musk was willing to pay $44b for a worthless app -- (link)
Posted by
hollywood big shot (aka pickmix)
Oct 28 '22, 14:55
(No message)
https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/1586070566221402113
(twitter.com)
Responses:
do you listen to pivot? I very much enjoy the relatively conspiracycorner speculation on why musk decided to go through with the deal after all.
-
judge amanda jones
Oct 28, 15:16
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.