Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 153
In response to
"
Election deniers out early... -- (link)
"
by
Ender
? Deniers? These sound like legit claims.. -- nm
Posted by
colin (aka colinski)
Nov 8 '22, 14:44
(No message)
Responses:
Last time Abrams claimed voter suppression she was unable to show in court a single person who was unable to vote... -- nm
-
Ender
Nov 8, 14:47
3
It is impossible to prove the negative. It's impossible to know who didn't vote because of the restrictions, the longer lines, etc. But it's fair to
-
pmb
Nov 8, 14:51
1
So... she can keep alleging this for the next 50 years and it's impossible to prove one way or the other?
-
Strongbad
Nov 8, 17:07
Ok sure, but voter suppression doesn't seem to me the same as denial..those folks believe there is voter fraud, not voter suppression. -- nm
-
colin
Nov 8, 14:49
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.