ST Alpha - "Rhodes, Meggs - guilty. Harrelson, Watkins, Caldwell - not guilty -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "GUILTY! (In the voice of the jury in Superman) -- nm*" by Jovian

Rhodes, Meggs - guilty. Harrelson, Watkins, Caldwell - not guilty -- nm

Posted by mud Nov 29 '22, 14:12

(No message)

Responses:

But it's a weird mix. For instance the others are guilty of conspiracy to obstruct, but Rhodes isn't, though they're all guilty of obstruction. - pmb Nov 29, 14:16 7
- If he obstructed independently, not conspiring with others? -- nm - Meg Nov 29, 14:56
- confusing mix helps them in the appeal, right? -- nm - mud Nov 29, 14:18 3
  - Possibly if there's confusion about the jury instructions and that's the basis of the appeal. -- nm - pmb Nov 29, 14:38
  - "Your honor, I'm just a simple caveman seditionist ..." -- nm - Beryllium Nov 29, 14:18 1
    - were any viking or astronaut? -- nm - mud Nov 29, 14:20
- Sounds like grounds for a mistrial! -- nm - Spawn Nov 29, 14:17
- I was just thinking this exact thing too -- nm - Jovian Nov 29, 14:17
more -- (link) - mud Nov 29, 14:15 1
- Maybe a "the coverup is worse than the crime" sort of scenario -- nm - Beryllium Nov 29, 14:18
Ill still take it -- nm - Jovian Nov 29, 14:14

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.