Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 155
In response to
"
Unless something happens, McCarthy has lost for a 7th time. -- nm
"
by
colin
Do we want McCarthy? I haven't been paying attention to this whole thing. And why are they voting on it 7 times? -- nm
Posted by
sycor
Jan 5 '23, 09:53
(No message)
Responses:
No, I think you'd want Hakeem Jeffries. But McCarthy is who the GOP are going with. Trying to.
-
Beryllium
Jan 5, 09:55
2
if this goes on so long that they eventually just throw up their hands and accept a plurality, then we get Hakeem Jeffries.
-
mud
Jan 5, 09:59
1
No, some of the No votes would change to yes to prevent that -- nm
-
mara
Jan 5, 10:15
Because the hard right wants all the power -- nm
-
Eag
Jan 5, 09:54
4
not even power, not even really sure what they want at this point. -- nm
-
colin
Jan 5, 09:57
3
Dismantling the government, one intentional fuckup at a time. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 5, 10:00
to destabilize the government
-
decline
Jan 5, 10:00
REVENGE -- nm
-
Jovian
Jan 5, 09:59
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.