ST Alpha - "it's a good question though ... under who's say so? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "The options are vote again or adjourn. They can’t get the votes to adjourn until people get hangry. -- nm" by Dano

it's a good question though ... under who's say so? -- nm

Posted by Reagen Jan 5 '23, 18:22

(No message)

Responses:

I'm not watching, but after each Speaker vote do they vote for adjournment? -- nm - JaxSean Jan 5, 18:57 1
- Nope, a member would need to move to adjourn. -- nm - znufrii Jan 5, 19:15
Under the Rules of the House. RC could probably quote you chapter and verse as to exactly which one. -- nm* - znufrii Jan 5, 18:23 6
- I'll double check House Rules, but it's a basic principle of parliamentary procedure dating back to Robert himself: adjournment reciprocates assembly. - ReluctantCynic Jan 5, 18:29
- Which theoretically they could change… after they elect a Speaker -- nm - Dano Jan 5, 18:26 4
  - isn't the speaker the one who enforces the rules? no speaker no rules! -- nm - mafic Jan 5, 18:28 2
    - (points to znufrii) -- nm* - ReluctantCynic Jan 5, 18:29 1
      - no I'm pretty sure my way is how it works -- nm - mafic Jan 5, 18:47
  - I believe the Clerk, as the presiding officer, can entertain a motion to pass a new Rule, for example, to allow a plurality election of speaker, but would need to have a majority vote to do so. -- nm* - znufrii Jan 5, 18:27

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.