Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 163
In response to
"
To recap B2: D&D has a new license that claims some ownership from anything made off it's content. So...
"
by
Mop
No. Absolutely not.
Posted by
crash davis (aka crash davis)
Jan 13 '23, 08:47
There is already Stranger Things branded D&D product, ergo there is already a licensing contract in place with them.
Exact same thing for Critical Role.
Responses:
But this is the difference between OGL and independent, separately negotiated licenses.
-
ReluctantCynic
Jan 13, 09:40
Right. Plus, royalties for using other company's products in TV shows and movies have a long establishment process.
-
Inigo
Jan 13, 08:53
1
and as with Critical Role, D&D needs Stranger Things more than the other way around
-
zork
Jan 13, 08:56
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.