Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 09:42
2: Nov 27, 18:07
3: Nov 27, 12:04
4: Nov 27, 08:26
5: Nov 26, 18:06
6: Nov 26, 12:05
7: Nov 26, 08:29
8: Nov 25, 18:33
9: Nov 25, 11:12
10: Nov 25, 07:08
11: Nov 24, 13:17
12: Nov 23, 18:13
13: Nov 23, 06:17
14: Nov 22, 13:24
15: Nov 22, 09:09
16: Nov 21, 22:36
17: Nov 21, 14:03
18: Nov 21, 10:18
19: Nov 21, 07:35
20: Nov 20, 15:19
Posts: 160
In response to
"
Tax write-down, it's content not art. -- nm
"
by
Under the Influence
Yes they get a write off equal to 21% of the actual cash they put out.
Posted by
spamlet
Jan 13 '23, 18:12
It’s a horribly inefficient business model to get back 21% of what you paid.
Responses:
And they don’t pay residuals. -- nm
-
MDH
Jan 13, 18:24
right? -- nm
-
Beaker
Jan 13, 18:19
4
if you can't make 21% of your production cost from ads from original airing and then selling the rights just fucking give up -- nm
-
Beaker
Jan 13, 18:20
3
TNT is Warners. there aren't enough ads in the world to make Discovery whole for the $3b they went in hock to buy it -- nm
-
hollywood big shot
Jan 13, 18:42
2
I'm buying Apple for 84 trillion dollars -- oh oh, so Apple suddenly doesn't make enough money to cover that now? -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 13, 18:49
1
this seems to be the difference between Disney buying FOX and Warners buying HBO. Disney wanted the content for D+, Warner wants the tax writeoff -- nm
-
Beaker
Jan 13, 18:53
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.