Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Yes on the first, ...does it? on the second.
"
by
Reagen
Some of the rarest items were free giveaway cards at Pokémon gatherings in the 1990s -- nm
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Jan 21 '23, 10:03
(No message)
Responses:
you think I am talking about it being a Pokemon item but I am talking about it being a video game cartridge. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 21, 10:08
5
Yes, in fact I didn't realize that at all. But ... it is both. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 21, 10:21
4
So let's be clear: video game cartridge (of any fashion) >= $10K ... nuts. Cuckoo banana town. Symptom of a broken set of priorities. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 21, 10:24
3
It's not worth 10K to me, no. But if I were eccentric and building a collection that showed the packaging and presentation of an era, missing pieces
-
Beryllium
Jan 21, 10:36
2
and I circle back to "that is dumb at that value" -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 21, 10:38
1
Well, it's an unfortunate reality that humans are dumb. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 21, 10:44
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
