ST Alpha - "But what this movie supposes is: what if it stopped? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 150

In response to "The core changes speed relative to the Earth but doesn't reverse direction -- (link)" by Reagen

But what this movie supposes is: what if it stopped? -- nm

Posted by Beryllium (aka grayman) Jan 23 '23, 16:26

(No message)

Responses:

we've got to get to...the Core -- nm - Beaker Jan 23, 16:45 1
- we're not getting to The Core, The Core is getting to us -- nm - hollywood big shot Jan 23, 17:19
(Which… if it's super rotating and subrotating, wouldn't there be a point where it was equirotating, however briefly? And wouldn't that be "stopped"?) -- nm - Beryllium Jan 23, 16:32 5
- I think "stopped" wouldn't ever be technically correct since everything is still rotating. -- nm - mafic Jan 23, 17:08 1
  - But rotating in unison, at a synchronized speed - they'd be "stopped" from both frames of reference, no? -- nm* - Beryllium Jan 23, 17:18
- Only if you assume the rotation vector changes in a continuous manner. You should apply for a grant to study that. -- nm - Baron, Vamp Champ Jan 23, 16:38
- The important thing is that it isn't switching directions. - TWuG Jan 23, 16:34 1
  - The Core 2: Rogue Planet -- nm - Beryllium Jan 23, 16:50

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.