Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 150
In response to
"
But what this movie supposes is: what if it stopped? -- nm
"
by
Beryllium
(Which… if it's super rotating and subrotating, wouldn't there be a point where it was equirotating, however briefly? And wouldn't that be "stopped"?) -- nm
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Jan 23 '23, 16:32
(No message)
Responses:
I think "stopped" wouldn't ever be technically correct since everything is still rotating. -- nm
-
mafic
Jan 23, 17:08
1
But rotating in unison, at a synchronized speed - they'd be "stopped" from both frames of reference, no? -- nm*
-
Beryllium
Jan 23, 17:18
Only if you assume the rotation vector changes in a continuous manner. You should apply for a grant to study that. -- nm
-
Baron, Vamp Champ
Jan 23, 16:38
The important thing is that it isn't switching directions.
-
TWuG
Jan 23, 16:34
1
The Core 2: Rogue Planet -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 23, 16:50
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.