Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 166
In response to
"
Considering how much re-imagining they do in the parks, I'm not sure rash fits. -- nm
"
by
Qale
They used the 'outrage' to change a beloved attraction in order to market a new/different Disney character.
Posted by
Jovian (aka Jovian)
Jan 25 '23, 09:59
rash in the sense it triggered this change and gave an excuse for it.
(theyve wanted to reimagine this attraction for years)
Responses:
So, exactly, not rash. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 25, 10:01
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.