Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 150
In response to
"
Because it is a meaningless criticism?
"
by
ReluctantCynic
It's really not though. Why allow it to stand? -- nm
Posted by
Jovian (aka Jovian)
Jan 26 '23, 11:48
(No message)
Responses:
Not every attack needs to be parried. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 26, 12:04
6
because thats how they win. Theyve already won. The DirectTV name is now trashed for millions. But sure not every attack should be parried. -- nm
-
Jovian
Jan 26, 12:14
5
Who are these millions? Your posts are the only things I've heard about this.
-
the wrong element
Jan 26, 13:23
There were plenty of democrats that have been lobbying to get them booted from Direct TV. Why step into the mess any further. Plenty of people are -- (edited)
-
pmb
Jan 26, 12:37
This is a bad take. DirecTV is a dead brand. Virtually nobody on this planet cares about this other than you.
-
The Allfather
Jan 26, 12:30
It's minnows fighting minnows here. No one outside of their bubble gives a flying fuck. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 26, 12:20
They dropped them over a dispute over money, not that they were the public relations for the destruction of democracy, fvck them -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Jan 26, 12:17
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
