Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 162
In response to
"
whatever laws are governing the handling of sensitive government information. -- nm
"
by
znufrii
So. None. -- nm
Posted by
Spawn
Jul 17 '09, 10:49
(No message)
Responses:
There are no laws governing classified government information? -- nm
-
Reagen
Jul 17, 10:50
22
Are there?
-
Spawn
Jul 17, 10:53
There certainly are. -- nm
-
Don Homer
Jul 17, 10:51
20
and even if this doesn't fall under those specifically, there are almost certainly military rules and regs which might as well be laws, as far her job
-
znufrii
Jul 17, 10:53
13
[deleted]
12
so, at worst she's guilty of using an overly broad term to illustrate her point. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 17, 10:55
11
Breaking a rule and breaking a law are kind of a different thing. -- nm
-
Spawn
Jul 17, 10:57
[deleted]
9
which was, at best, a side issue.
-
Reagen
Jul 17, 10:58
8
[deleted]
4
My point is that I can't understand *why* that's the part of the discussion people care about.
-
Reagen
Jul 17, 11:03
3
[deleted]
(although really, I suppose I can't quite understand why people got worked up over it anyway)
-
Reagen
Jul 17, 11:05
1
But see, I am not *worked up*. I just find her posturing a bit preposterous.
-
Spawn
Jul 17, 11:07
To you, maybe. -- nm
-
Spawn
Jul 17, 11:01
2
just posting 'cause I like really tiny text -- nm
-
decline
Jul 17, 11:07
1
Just adds to the post count of my thread! -- nm
-
Spawn
Jul 17, 11:08
Right. Which is why I find the incredulity a little baffling.
-
Reagen
Jul 17, 10:51
5
[deleted]
4
See what you all have done now? You got him talking all lawyer-y now. I hope you're happy! -- nm
-
Jim
Jul 17, 10:56
1
[deleted]
I don't know the law, but my guess is that it's overkill by the IT Security and probably not an actual law. -- nm
-
Don Homer
Jul 17, 10:55
1
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.