Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 156
In response to
"
oh, the other really nasty combo like this is with Gambit. Instead of having negative power you end up with zero cards -- nm
"
by
oblique
I really feel like Gambit shouldn't be able to destroy one of your cards if your opponent doesn't have one to discard.
Posted by
St. Louis BaronHawks (aka BaronWasteland)
Feb 28 '23, 06:20
As it is, he can blow up your entire board with the right combo and cost himself nothing.
Responses:
Was just going to say this— -- nm
-
Flav
Feb 28, 06:31
2
Technically the way the card is written, it is working as intented
-
oblique
Feb 28, 06:33
1
True, but the Gambit nuke is as much fun as Cosmo on Kamar-Taj. -- nm
-
St. Louis BaronHawks
Feb 28, 06:39
Agreed. It almost feels like a bug but not one they acknowledge -- nm
-
oblique
Feb 28, 06:25
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.