Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 156
In response to
"
Got owned in SNAP—wish I had screen shot it…I had 4 cards played and still ended with a -25 in one zone and -17 in another zone -- (edited)
"
by
Flav
Unrelated: I recommend taking a second look at the new version of Sandman. He went from "hard to play correctly" to "game winner." -- nm
Posted by
St. Louis BaronHawks (aka BaronWasteland)
Feb 28 '23, 06:39
(No message)
Responses:
I see surprisingly little of him (though I think his existence changed the meta dramatically). Don't see (or play) Sera or Zoo decks anymore -- nm
-
oblique
Feb 28, 06:42
2
He went from 4/1 to 5/5. He stops a Turn 6 swarm cold while contributing enough to help win a location now.
-
St. Louis BaronHawks
Feb 28, 06:45
1
With how much I'm seeing Shuri decks now, they care little for sandman -- nm
-
oblique
Feb 28, 06:46
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.