ST Alpha - "How much actual collusion is going on with NFL owners to use Jackson as an example to “reset” after the Watson contract? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

How much actual collusion is going on with NFL owners to use Jackson as an example to “reset” after the Watson contract? -- nm

Posted by Dano (aka dano) Mar 8 '23, 04:39

(No message)

Responses:

Depends on what you mean by collusion. - the wrong element Mar 8, 05:11
I don’t think so … he’s a crazy case where he’s worth that healthy but he’s not been healthy 2 years. - Will Hunting Mar 8, 05:04
100%. 100% of the collusion -- nm - prayformojo Mar 8, 04:54
A bunch—good news for the Ravens though, if they lose Lamar they still have Pro Bowl QB Tyler Huntley - Flav Mar 8, 04:53
i think its more of a collusion about how stupid the Watson contract was, and not really anything else. -- nm - tRuMaN Mar 8, 04:49
A lot of collusion. By teams publicly stating it in unison. Of course the cover would be 2 1st round picks and the question of injury. -- nm - budice Mar 8, 04:47 4
- One thing to keep in mind is that teams couldn't publicly talk about interest in Lamar before he was tagged. - the wrong element Mar 8, 05:01 3
  - And these same teams might think they have draft picks to make that change the equation so they are “no…now” -- nm - Will Hunting Mar 8, 05:06 2
    - They also don't want to work out a deal and have Baltimore match it. - the wrong element Mar 8, 05:32 1
      - It's the same. This article has an excellent explanation. -- (link) - Volnelk Mar 8, 05:36
I go back and forth. I doubt an explicit conversation has taken place, but I do think many side conversations have happened. - Volnelk Mar 8, 04:46

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.