Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 155
I kinda like an idea from...Nelson Peltz. -- (link)
Posted by
David (aka David)
Mar 20 '23, 21:35
(No message)
"The worst person you know..."
(www.cnbc.com)
Responses:
I actually had that same idea a week ago. -- (edited)
-
znufrii, meh and problematic
Mar 21, 05:22
I’m curious as to the negatives because it seems logical and reasonable. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Mar 21, 05:09
3
If it’s voluntary no one will do it because they know the government will bail them out if it comes to it (see last week)
-
spamlet
Mar 21, 05:32
1
On the other hand, it gives the Fed more regulatory leverage, i.e. riskier banks would face higher premiums for their deposits.
-
znufrii, meh and problematic
Mar 21, 05:41
First one is the likelihood that banks will just modify their fee structure so small retail depositors end up subsidizing the premiums
-
znufrii, meh and problematic
Mar 21, 05:24
Government insurance? HA! -- nm
-
Mop
Mar 20, 22:00
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
