Airbnb is trash so caveat emptor but because sec. 230 insulates them from liability for their users scammy acts, this person is almost certainly SOL -- (link)
|
(No message)
|
Responses:
-
Pssh, I thought this would be about an exorbitant cleaning fee or a rental from someone who didn't have any legal right to the place -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Mar 22, 13:36
-
I don't know why AirBnB is responsible for the owner's actions in this case. I also don't get your hate for 230.
-
Krusty
Mar 22, 13:36
2
-
more the "Acts of God" provision. I think the owners are responsible for the residence, not what goes on around it. -- nm*
-
budice
Mar 22, 13:15
1
-
Walk me through it. If section 230 didn't exist, how does AirBNB protect consumers from this vendor? -- nm
-
Mop
Mar 22, 13:12
-
I feel like at least part of the blame of this belongs on the guests. the host definitely deserves blame as well, but, the guests need to be a little
-
Andie
Mar 22, 13:11
1
|