Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 157
In response to
"
The attack on trans people has expanded beyond children to adults rather quickly. This alone should be enough to never support a Republican. -- (link)
"
by
TWuG
it should be grounds for Dems to offer full-throated opposition to these laws. and yet… -- nm
Posted by
hollywood big shot (aka pickmix)
Mar 24 '23, 10:34
(No message)
Responses:
That assumes Dem voters are solidly in support of trans issues, but they're not.
-
Roger More
Mar 24, 11:02
4
80+% support for everything but sports (still a solid 67% favorable) isn't solid support?
-
TWuG
Mar 24, 11:59
1
I won't bring to another board, but no - 80% is obviously a clear majority, but 20% is enough to be an important part of any coalition. -- nm
-
Roger More
Mar 24, 12:49
until the GOP started their war on trans in NC with the bathroom bill (which was spectacularly UNsuccessful) nobody even thought about the issue
-
hollywood big shot
Mar 24, 11:09
1
and the only reason they're all-in on anti-trans now is because overturning Roe has been a disaster with the female vote. which, unsurprisingly, Dems
-
hollywood big shot
Mar 24, 11:13
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.