Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 151
In response to
"
my understanding from Law Twitter's analysis is the MSJ ruling also precludes Fox from offering several defenses that might otherwise make proving
"
by
hollywood big shot
is this re: -- (link)
Posted by
mud
Mar 31 '23, 15:56
(No message)
this?
(twitter.com)
Responses:
I'll take a look but I can't imagine Fox has much chance here with the emails that have been disclosed and the depositions they've given.
-
pmb
Mar 31, 16:30
good law prof thread counting the ways it’s bad for Rupert -- (link)
-
hollywood big shot
Mar 31, 16:02
3
"bold, italics, and capital letters" ! -- nm
-
mud
Mar 31, 16:08
2
every email is more damning than the last -- (link)
-
hollywood big shot
Mar 31, 16:50
1
Now why did they insist on going to trial? -- nm
-
.
Mar 31, 17:26
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.