ST Alpha - "Not quite, but the email contained a bunch of extra information that shouldn't've been published openly." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 167

In response to "Did they identify you or your kid? Because i would be livid if they did that. -- nm" by Andie

Not quite, but the email contained a bunch of extra information that shouldn't've been published openly.

Posted by Beryllium (aka grayman) Apr 6 '23, 10:17

I think there was a miscommunication about the nature of the particular address being emailed, so it might be partly on us for not understanding that community feedback / community engagement would be public and not private.

Responses:

Also, because it's on the agenda, it might get read aloud at tonight's meeting. And published in video form forever. -- nm - Beryllium Apr 6, 10:38 1
- Decompressed the PDF and was able to confirm that it didn't contain sender information, so that's something at least -- nm - Beryllium Apr 6, 10:41
At minimum let them know your feelings and get clarity on how communications like that are handled. TBH I feel your feedback would be appreciated. -- nm - zunkskunk Apr 6, 10:21 1
- Yep, this. -- nm - JaxSean Apr 6, 10:23
that should have been made very clear, that responses might be shared. -- nm - Andie Apr 6, 10:20

Post a message top

Not quite, but the email contained a bunch of extra information that shouldn't've been published openly.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.