Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 150
Fox to Dominion and the judge: Oh did we not mention Rupert Murdoch is an executive of both companies before? our bad -- (link)
Posted by
hollywood big shot (aka pickmix)
Apr 11 '23, 15:25
(No message)
https://deadline.com/2023/04/fox-dominion-defamation-trial-1235321771/
(deadline.com)
Responses:
"In that case, summary judgement on the final count for Dominion. Court dismissed." -- nm
-
TWuG
Apr 11, 17:27
Wow. -- nm
-
znufrii
Apr 11, 15:29
6
Just a small oversight -- nm
-
decline
Apr 11, 15:34
this is a surprise? honestly, I don't know of these things -- nm
-
mud
Apr 11, 15:31
4
it's kind of the basic Interrogatory No. 1 information that (should) be fully disclosed at the outset of any corporate litigation
-
hollywood big shot
Apr 11, 15:37
3
Yeah, it’s a pretty ballsy omission. -- nm
-
znufrii
Apr 11, 16:15
especially since part of Fox's defence was "he's not really involved. he's only Fox." -- nm
-
mafic
Apr 11, 16:11
interesting -- nm
-
mud
Apr 11, 15:41
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.