Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 156
This is spot on -- (link)
Posted by
Jovian (aka Jovian)
Apr 20 '23, 09:48
(No message)
https://twitter.com/ElieNYC/status/1649072502885212160?s=20
(twitter.com)
Responses:
IF CBS News reported that an erroneous tweet was "direct evidence that mainstream media outlets believe their job is to promote the rich"
-
would we call that accurate?
Apr 20, 10:11
What would accurate look like? Because this outcome was well within the range of outcomes SpaceX expected. Their
-
TWuG
Apr 20, 09:52
19
Success in Failure: Space X Gleans Key Data After Rocket Explosion -- nm*
-
Qale
Apr 20, 10:00
But do you think the lay reader understands that nuance?
-
znufrii
Apr 20, 09:56
4
If reporters are doing their job, yes. Also, the headline isn't meant to be the full story.
-
TWuG
Apr 20, 10:05
2
Reporters don’t write the headlines, and it’s precisely the headline I’m faulting here, because that’s all most people will see.
-
znufrii
Apr 20, 10:09
1
Nah, it's maybe clickbait: "A success, but it exploded?" The failure is with people who think that and then fail to read the article.
-
TWuG
Apr 20, 10:13
You will not question its success!!!!! -- nm
-
Jovian
Apr 20, 09:57
The tweet should have been: "Starship explodes, but Musk and SpaceX happy because astronauts are expendable" -- nm
-
decline
Apr 20, 09:55
7
What I'll say here is that the microreactions of the people in that room were looks of abject failure.
-
David
Apr 20, 10:07
6
Sure, I'd be bummed too if it had gone that far past initial expectations and then fell apart.
-
TWuG
Apr 20, 10:16
4
No. These people looked defeated. -- nm
-
David
Apr 20, 10:18
3
Spend a year or more on a project. Dot your i's and cross your t's on something no one anywhere has ever done before. Set a goal
-
TWuG
Apr 20, 10:24
2
Also is there reporting that the SpaceX middle management is the cavalier Enron of engineering companies?
-
Max
Apr 20, 10:27
1
Pretty much the IM.
-
TWuG
Apr 20, 10:35
Completely understandable for that to be the case given how much work has gone in to even getting to program to this place.
-
znufrii
Apr 20, 10:11
Or have gotten so complacent with rocketry they expect it to work first time, every time. -- nm
-
spamlet
Apr 20, 09:55
2
How many disassemblies did SpaceX encounter before landing a booster? It felt like dozens. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Apr 20, 09:55
1
It was a fair number. And now Falcon 9 launches about every 4 days, with nearly 200 booster recoveries.
-
TWuG
Apr 20, 09:59
Personally, I think anything that doesnt literally have them sucking Elon's dick might be a good first step. -- nm
-
Jovian
Apr 20, 09:54
1
"literally"! -- nm
-
mud
Apr 20, 09:56
Well, it's not wrong - CBS just doesn't mention that little hiccup that happened **after* the successful launch -- nm
-
decline
Apr 20, 09:51
8
I dont see how something blowing up a minute or two after launch is considered a successful launch. -- nm
-
Jovian
Apr 20, 09:55
6
Because it was a test of a rocket that had never flown before. Success wasn't defined as 100% achievement of all
-
TWuG
Apr 20, 10:03
The goal was to get off the pad. It did that, so therefore success.
-
spamlet
Apr 20, 10:01
2
This was never intended to be an orbital flight in any case. -- nm
-
znufrii
Apr 20, 10:02
1
Well, most of an orbit. -- nm
-
spamlet
Apr 20, 10:04
Because the technical standard for success of this launch was to clear the tower. Everything else was extra gravy. -- (edited)
-
znufrii
Apr 20, 10:01
Same. Although, I think the answer is included in your phrasing. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Apr 20, 09:56
Right, it got off the pad just fine. -- nm
-
Meg
Apr 20, 09:53
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.